Rosenstein v. North Penn School District

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Rosenstein v. North Penn School District

342 A.2d 788, 19 Pa. Commw. 323, 1975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1005

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 28, 1975·No. Appeal, No. 1281 C.D. 1974·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

Opinion,

We have carefully read the record and considered the contentions advanced by Dr. Paul F. Rosenstein and Wanda Rosenstein, husband and wife, as parents and [324] natural guardians of Michelle Karin Rosenstein, appellants here. We conclude that the court below not only rendered the correct decision but adequately stated the reasons for that decision in its opinion. Accordingly, we hereby affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Lowe for the court below which is reported at 99 Mont. Co. L.R. 1 (1975).

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Opinion,

We have carefully read the record and considered the contentions advanced by Dr. Paul F. Rosenstein and Wanda Rosenstein, husband and wife, as parents and [324] natural guardians of Michelle Karin Rosenstein, appellants here. We conclude that the court below not only rendered the correct decision but adequately stated the reasons for that decision in its opinion. Accordingly, we hereby affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Lowe for the court below which is reported at 99 Mont. Co. L.R. 1 (1975).

Order affirmed.

Rosenstein v. North Penn School District, 342 A.2d 788, 19 Pa. Commw. 323, 1975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1005 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

342 A.2d 788 (Rosenstein v. North Penn School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related