Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

111 N.Y.S. 718

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 30, 1908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered against it in favor of the plaintiff, and also brings up for review two orders denying its two motions made that a commission issue to take the testimony of an absent witness. The orders appealed from are in the record, but the moving papers and the affidavits submitted in support of the motions are not annexed to or form part of the return.

The record will therefore be returned to the lower court for resettlement and correction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered against it in favor of the plaintiff, and also brings up for review two orders denying its two motions made that a commission issue to take the testimony of an absent witness. The orders appealed from are in the record, but the moving papers and the affidavits submitted in support of the motions are not annexed to or form part of the return.

The record will therefore be returned to the lower court for resettlement and correction.

Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 111 N.Y.S. 718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

111 N.Y.S. 718 (Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.