Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

111 N.Y.S. 718

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.Y.S. 718 (Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenstein v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 111 N.Y.S. 718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered against it in favor of the plaintiff, and also brings up for review two orders denying its two motions made that a commission issue to take the testimony of an absent witness. The orders appealed from are in the record, but the moving papers and the affidavits submitted in support of the motions are not annexed to or form part of the return.

The record will therefore be returned to the lower court for resettlement and correction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered against it in favor of the plaintiff, and also brings up for review two orders denying its two motions made that a commission issue to take the testimony of an absent witness. The orders appealed from are in the record, but the moving papers and the affidavits submitted in support of the motions are not annexed to or form part of the return.

The record will therefore be returned to the lower court for resettlement and correction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 N.Y.S. 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-nyappterm-1908.