Rosenstein v. Kutakoff
This text of 231 A.D. 764 (Rosenstein v. Kutakoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. Upon the plaintiff’s testimony, the question of the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence was for the jury. (Knapp v. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenstein-v-kutakoff-nyappdiv-1930.