Rosenschein v. Friedman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenschein v. Friedman

132 N.Y.S. 769

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 132 N.Y.S. 769 (Rosenschein v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenschein v. Friedman, 132 N.Y.S. 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] The defendant appeals from two orders, entered, respectively, on July 11 and September 26, 1911. The appeal from the first order must be dismissed, because no notice of appeal was served within 20 days after the entry of the order. The appeal from the second order must be dismissed, because it is not an appealable order. The .notice of appeal also specifies an undated “formal order and judgment,” which is not in the clerk’s return, and this appeal must also be dismissed.

Appeals dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] The defendant appeals from two orders, entered, respectively, on July 11 and September 26, 1911. The appeal from the first order must be dismissed, because no notice of appeal was served within 20 days after the entry of the order. The appeal from the second order must be dismissed, because it is not an appealable order. The .notice of appeal also specifies an undated “formal order and judgment,” which is not in the clerk’s return, and this appeal must also be dismissed.

Appeals dismissed, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 N.Y.S. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenschein-v-friedman-nyappterm-1912.