Rosenkrantz v. Sutton
This text of 384 So. 2d 270 (Rosenkrantz v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final order under review [which construed a written stipulation settling a lawsuit between the parties] is affirmed upon a holding that the trial court reasonably construed and applied paragraph 14 of said stipulation to entitle the appellee John R. Sutton to 10% of the 40% contingent fee receivable from the client for legal repre[271]*271sentation at trial in a certain case, which construction we are not disposed to reverse based on the legal principles stated in Hall v. Hall, 135 So.2d 432, 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 So. 2d 270, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenkrantz-v-sutton-fladistctapp-1980.