Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Co.
181 A.D. 886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1917
StatusPublished
This text of 181 A.D. 886 (Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosenkrantz v. Standard Motor Service Co., 181 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, because of the inconsistency of the verdict against the alleged principal (liable only under the rule of respondeat superior), with no finding against the driver of the automobile. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenkrantz-v-standard-motor-service-co-nyappdiv-1917.