Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.
65 Misc. 2d 467, 317 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1913
Opinion
Motion by defendants Salvo Realty Corp. and Midas Collections, Inc., to dismiss the complaint, is granted.
[468]*468Section 489 of the Judiciary Law does not make illegal an assignment of a mortgage which has already been foreclpsed by the original holder of the mortgage; nor does it make illegal an assignment of the judgment; nor does it make illegal an assignment of a mortgage and its note then in foreclosure to a corporation intending to continue the foreclosure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp., 65 Misc. 2d 467, 317 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1913 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1971).
65 Misc. 2d 467 (Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
288 F. Supp. 2d 262 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Roslyn Savings Bank v. Jones
69 Misc. 2d 733 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
First National Bank v. Felder
69 Misc. 2d 812 (Suffolk County District Court, 1972)