Home/New York Supreme Court/Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.

Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.

65 Misc. 2d 467, 317 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1913
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 65 Misc. 2d 467 (Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp., 65 Misc. 2d 467, 317 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1913 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1971).

Opinion

Mabio Pittoni, J.

Motion by defendants Salvo Realty Corp. and Midas Collections, Inc., to dismiss the complaint, is granted.

[468]*468Section 489 of the Judiciary Law does not make illegal an assignment of a mortgage which has already been foreclpsed by the original holder of the mortgage; nor does it make illegal an assignment of the judgment; nor does it make illegal an assignment of a mortgage and its note then in foreclosure to a corporation intending to continue the foreclosure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
288 F. Supp. 2d 262 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Roslyn Savings Bank v. Jones
69 Misc. 2d 733 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
First National Bank v. Felder
69 Misc. 2d 812 (Suffolk County District Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Misc. 2d 467, 317 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenkrantz-v-salvo-realty-corp-nysupct-1971.