Rosenkrantz v. Druckman

Supreme Court of Florida

Rosenkrantz v. Druckman

180 So. 2d 466

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 1965

DocketNo. 34649

StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 2d 466 (Rosenkrantz v. Druckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenkrantz v. Druckman, 180 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date August 9, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petitions for attorneys’ fees are denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI