Rosenkoff v. Mariani

226 F.2d 54, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 332
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 21, 1955
DocketNo. 12591
StatusPublished

This text of 226 F.2d 54 (Rosenkoff v. Mariani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenkoff v. Mariani, 226 F.2d 54, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 332 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for breach of contract. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 F.2d 54, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenkoff-v-mariani-cadc-1955.