Rosenheim v. New York Railways Corp.
This text of 244 A.D. 709 (Rosenheim v. New York Railways Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the court erred in charging the jury that the alleged violations of traffic regulations and the Code of Ordinances were “acts of negligence or negligent acts.” (Knupfle v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 84 N. Y. 488; McCarragher v. Proal, 114 App. Div. 470; Dodican v. Smith, 221 id. 383; Donnelly v. City of Rochester, 166 N. Y. 315; Hyland v. Cobb, 252 id. 325.) Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenheim-v-new-york-railways-corp-nyappdiv-1935.