Rosengrave v. Clelland

16 Colo. App. 474
Colorado Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1901·No. No. 2032·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gunter, J.

This action, originating in a justice court upon a covenant in a -warranty deed against taxes, is here from a trial on appeal in the county court. The defense was, that the deed was made in pursuance of a written contract between the grantor therein and a third party; that such contract was assigned to and assumed by the grantee in the deed, the plaintiff below, the appellee here; that such contract contained a provision obligating the contractee to discharge the taxes here in question ; that such clause should have gone into the warranty deed, and that by mistake it was omitted therefrom and the clause obligating the grantor to discharge such taxes included therein; that such facts entitled appellant to a reformation eliminating such covenant for payment of taxes from the deed and were, therefore, a defense hereto. This equitable defense requiring affirmative relief could be entertained only in a court having equitable jurisdiction. A justice of the peace has no equitable jurisdiction under the laws of Colorado. Robinson v. Compher, 13 Colo. App. 343; Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, vol. 18, p. 31.

[475] This true, the county court acquired no jurisdiction of the defense on appeal. Robinson v. Compher, supra. Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosengrave v. Clelland, 16 Colo. App. 474 (Colo. Ct. App. 1901).

16 Colo. App. 474 (Rosengrave v. Clelland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick v. Brown
36 Colo. 298 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1906)