Rosenfield v. Heller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenfield v. Heller

126 Misc. 328, 213 N.Y.S. 248, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 126 Misc. 328 (Rosenfield v. Heller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenfield v. Heller, 126 Misc. 328, 213 N.Y.S. 248, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While ordinarily it is not the office of the court to inquire into the sufficiency of a defense where the motion is to vacate the examination of a party for the purpose of supporting it when, as here, the attempted defense is so palpably insufficient on its face that no evidence in support thereof could be adduced upon the trial, we feel warranted in ordering a vacation of the notice. Nowhere does the defense allege a single act done by plaintiffs to the actual injury of the defendant. The order appealed from is reversed and the notice for examination is vacated.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

While ordinarily it is not the office of the court to inquire into the sufficiency of a defense where the motion is to vacate the examination of a party for the purpose of supporting it when, as here, the attempted defense is so palpably insufficient on its face that no evidence in support thereof could be adduced upon the trial, we feel warranted in ordering a vacation of the notice. Nowhere does the defense allege a single act done by plaintiffs to the actual injury of the defendant. The order appealed from is reversed and the notice for examination is vacated.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 Misc. 328, 213 N.Y.S. 248, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfield-v-heller-nyappterm-1926.