Rosenfield v. Gilmore

32 Tex. 659
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Tex. 659 (Rosenfield v. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenfield v. Gilmore, 32 Tex. 659 (Tex. 1870).

Opinion

Walker, J.

There is no error in the action of the court below in taking up the motion to dissolve the injunction, when reached upon the call of the motion docket. (See Smith v. Ryan, 20 Tex., 665; Houston v. Berry, 3 Tex., 335.)

Nor was it error to dissolve an injunction when no bond had been filed with the district clerk before issuing the writ. (Pas. Dig., Art. 3933.) There may be very culpable negligence on the part of some of the parties concerned in directing a bond to be filed in an improper. court, and then acting upon the hypothesis that no bond had been filed in the proper court; but we see no error upon the record to warrant us in reversing the judgment. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Ryan
20 Tex. 661 (Texas Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Tex. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfield-v-gilmore-tex-1870.