Rosenfeld v. Young
159 S.E.2d 450, 117 Ga. App. 37, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1296
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosenfeld v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ga. App. 35 →
Opinion
This case involves Mr. S. E. Young’s suit for medical expenses, loss of services and loss of his wife’s con[38]*38sortium for her injuries resulting from the same collision as that in Rosenfeld v. Young, 117 Ga. App. 35. Held:
The enumerations of error in this case are controlled by the decision in the companion case, ante, with the exception of one ground relating to a charge. We have carefully examined the charge in light of the defendant’s contention and find it to be without error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenfeld v. Young, 159 S.E.2d 450, 117 Ga. App. 37, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1296 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).
159 S.E.2d 450 (Rosenfeld v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenfeld v. Young
159 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)