Rosenfeld v. Roebling Coal Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rosenfeld v. Roebling Coal Co., Inc.

5 A.2d 695, 125 N.J. Eq. 348, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 659

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 21, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 A.2d 695 (Rosenfeld v. Roebling Coal Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenfeld v. Roebling Coal Co., Inc., 5 A.2d 695, 125 N.J. Eq. 348, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 659 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the record and the arguments of counsel in this cause. The conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor, who dismissed the complainant’s hill seeking a receiver for the defendant company, was in all respects proper, because the bill lacked proofs and was insufficient.

The decree of dismissal is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI