Rosenfeld v. Park Plastics Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenfeld v. Park Plastics Co.

19 A.D.2d 733, 242 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 733 (Rosenfeld v. Park Plastics Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenfeld v. Park Plastics Co., 19 A.D.2d 733, 242 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury and by bis father to recover damages for loss of services and for medical expenses, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 10, 1962, which denied their motion to amend their complaint and bill of particulars so as to allege, inter alla, an additional cause of action on behalf of the infant plaintiff 'based on breach of warranty. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The amended complaint and amended bill of particulars shall be served within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion. We pass on no question other than the one relating to the proper exercise of discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury and by bis father to recover damages for loss of services and for medical expenses, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 10, 1962, which denied their motion to amend their complaint and bill of particulars so as to allege, inter alla, an additional cause of action on behalf of the infant plaintiff 'based on breach of warranty. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The amended complaint and amended bill of particulars shall be served within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion. We pass on no question other than the one relating to the proper exercise of discretion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 733, 242 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfeld-v-park-plastics-co-nyappdiv-1963.