Rosenfeld v. Hackett
This text of 311 F. App'x 29 (Rosenfeld v. Hackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant’s motion to correct an error in the reply brief is granted.
Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s request for preliminary injunc-tive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 F. App'x 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfeld-v-hackett-ca9-2009.