Rosenfeld v. Community School District 28

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenfeld v. Community School District 28

25 A.D.3d 596, 806 N.Y.S.2d 888

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an application, in effect, to vacate an arbitration award, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated June 4, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his application.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs motion was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument (see Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545 [2005]; Amsler v Verrilli, 203 AD2d 403 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an application, in effect, to vacate an arbitration award, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated June 4, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his application.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs motion was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument (see Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545 [2005]; Amsler v Verrilli, 203 AD2d 403 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.

Rosenfeld v. Community School District 28, 25 A.D.3d 596, 806 N.Y.S.2d 888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

25 A.D.3d 596 (Rosenfeld v. Community School District 28) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related