Rosenfeld v. Community School District 28
This text of 25 A.D.3d 596 (Rosenfeld v. Community School District 28) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an application, in effect, to vacate an arbitration award, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated June 4, 2004, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his application.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The plaintiffs motion was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument (see Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545 [2005]; Amsler v Verrilli, 203 AD2d 403 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.3d 596, 806 N.Y.S.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfeld-v-community-school-district-28-nyappdiv-2006.