Rosenfeld v. Boniske

465 S.W.3d 511, 2015 WL 4281447
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 14, 2015·No. No. ED 102398·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Donald and Lynne Rosenfeld appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County awarding defendant Deborah Boniske $68,105.94 in damages. The Rosenfelds contend that the trial court erred in: (1) finding that there was a valid contract between the parties; (2) finding the contract’s sale contingency required the Rosenfelds to exercise reasonable efforts to sell their home; (3) finding the Rosenfelds did not exercise reasonable efforts to sell their home; and (4) awarding Ms. Boniske $68,105.94 in damages.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential [512] value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenfeld v. Boniske, 465 S.W.3d 511, 2015 WL 4281447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

465 S.W.3d 511 (Rosenfeld v. Boniske) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.