Rosenfeld Co. v. Jackson & Son

156 S.E. 636, 42 Ga. App. 491, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1931
Docket20633
StatusPublished

This text of 156 S.E. 636 (Rosenfeld Co. v. Jackson & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenfeld Co. v. Jackson & Son, 156 S.E. 636, 42 Ga. App. 491, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This was a suit for an alleged balance due on an open account, to which the defendant pleaded payment; and from the evidence introduced of payments made by the defendant which were credited by the plaintiff, and of payments which were not credited, the inference was authorized that the account had been paid in full, and the verdict and judgment for the defendant, by the court acting as the trior of the facts, were authorized by the evidence and were not contrary to law.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J-, and Bell, J., concur. F. A. Cantrell, Wright & Covington, for plaintiff. J. G. B. Erwin, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 636, 42 Ga. App. 491, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfeld-co-v-jackson-son-gactapp-1931.