Rosenfeld Co. v. Jackson & Son
This text of 156 S.E. 636 (Rosenfeld Co. v. Jackson & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit for an alleged balance due on an open account, to which the defendant pleaded payment; and from the evidence introduced of payments made by the defendant which were credited by the plaintiff, and of payments which were not credited, the inference was authorized that the account had been paid in full, and the verdict and judgment for the defendant, by the court acting as the trior of the facts, were authorized by the evidence and were not contrary to law.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 S.E. 636, 42 Ga. App. 491, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenfeld-co-v-jackson-son-gactapp-1931.