Rosendo Torres III v. Navarro Place Apartments

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 17, 2019
Docket13-18-00571-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rosendo Torres III v. Navarro Place Apartments (Rosendo Torres III v. Navarro Place Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosendo Torres III v. Navarro Place Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00571-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ROSENDO TORRES III, Appellant,

v.

NAVARRO PLACE APARTMENTS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant Rosendo Torres III appealed a judgment entered in trial court cause

number 2018-CCV-61523-5 in the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas.

On October 15, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal

failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(a),(d),(e) and Rule

25.1(d),(e). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(a),(d),(e); id. R. 25.1(d),(e). The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk’s office within thirty

days from the date of that notice. On November 19, 2018, the Clerk notified appellant

that these defects had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be

dismissed if the defects were not cured within ten days. To date, the defects have not

been corrected. See id. R. 37.3; id. R. 42.3(b),(c).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

correct the defects, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. R.

37.3; id. R. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the 17th day of January, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rosendo Torres III v. Navarro Place Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosendo-torres-iii-v-navarro-place-apartments-texapp-2019.