Rosendale v. McNulty

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Rosendale v. McNulty

50 A. 850, 23 R.I. 465, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 135

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 8, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 50 A. 850 (Rosendale v. McNulty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosendale v. McNulty, 50 A. 850, 23 R.I. 465, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 135 (R.I. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) The defendant, Mary McNulty, has refused to answer questions put to her in taking her-deposition, upon the ground that her answers would criminate herself. The questions do not show that such a result would be possible, and hence the questions should have been answered. A writ of attachment against said Mary McNulty will issue, unless at such time as shall be fixed by the master, within *466 twenty days from this date, she shall appear before him and answer the questions which she refused to answer and shall also within that time pay the costs upon this citation, to he taxed by the clerk, and an additional sum of ten dollars for counsel’s fee for complainant’s counsel, which sums are not to he recovered back in any event.

T. M. O’Reilly, for complainants. J. M. Brennan, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

(1) The defendant, Mary McNulty, has refused to answer questions put to her in taking her-deposition, upon the ground that her answers would criminate herself. The questions do not show that such a result would be possible, and hence the questions should have been answered. A writ of attachment against said Mary McNulty will issue, unless at such time as shall be fixed by the master, within *466 twenty days from this date, she shall appear before him and answer the questions which she refused to answer and shall also within that time pay the costs upon this citation, to he taxed by the clerk, and an additional sum of ten dollars for counsel’s fee for complainant’s counsel, which sums are not to he recovered back in any event.

T. M. O’Reilly, for complainants. J. M. Brennan, for respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A. 850, 23 R.I. 465, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosendale-v-mcnulty-ri-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack