Rosenbusch v. Wilkinson
88 S.E. 709, 17 Ga. App. 833, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 970
This text of 88 S.E. 709 (Rosenbusch v. Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosenbusch v. Wilkinson, 88 S.E. 709, 17 Ga. App. 833, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 970 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the amended answer.
2. In the state of the record, no material error of law is shown. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in over: ruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 709, 17 Ga. App. 833, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbusch-v-wilkinson-gactapp-1916.