Rosenbluth v. Sackadorf

274 A.D. 794, 79 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3376
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 1948·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Action to recover damages for the fraud of defendants in procuring favorable determinations by the Office of Price Administration and the Municipal Court as to their good faith in representing that they sought possession of an apartment, occupied by plaintiff, for the purpose of making alterations. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. (David v. Fayman, 273 App. Div. 408.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [190 Misc. 665.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenbluth v. Sackadorf, 274 A.D. 794, 79 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

274 A.D. 794 (Rosenbluth v. Sackadorf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calvin v. Martin
111 N.E.2d 786 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1952)
Schussel v. Jamaica Investors, Inc.
199 Misc. 172 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Vanderporten v. Slutsky
196 Misc. 891 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Lyster v. Berberich
65 A.2d 632 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Dumas v. Prochazka
193 Misc. 1013 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1948)
Wigod v. Janina Realty Corp.
193 Misc. 397 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)