Rosenblum v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenblum v. Smith

4 A.D.2d 708, 164 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4973

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 708 (Rosenblum v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenblum v. Smith, 4 A.D.2d 708, 164 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries and by her mother for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for $13,750 in favor of the infant and for $1,750 in favor of her mother. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate, within 10 days after the entry of the order hereon, to reduce the verdict to $9,000 for the infant and to $500 for the mother, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries and by her mother for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for $13,750 in favor of the infant and for $1,750 in favor of her mother. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate, within 10 days after the entry of the order hereon, to reduce the verdict to $9,000 for the infant and to $500 for the mother, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 708, 164 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblum-v-smith-nyappdiv-1957.