Rosenblum v. Singer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenblum v. Singer

271 A.D.2d 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 922 (Rosenblum v. Singer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenblum v. Singer, 271 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Considering the nature- of the evidence as to the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, we find that the verdict rendered by the jury was not so grossly inadequate as to warrant setting same aside. Order setting aside the verdict unanimously reversed, and the verdict reinstated, with costs and disbursements to the defendant-appellant to be credited upon the judgment to be entered. Present — Martin, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Peck and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Considering the nature- of the evidence as to the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, we find that the verdict rendered by the jury was not so grossly inadequate as to warrant setting same aside. Order setting aside the verdict unanimously reversed, and the verdict reinstated, with costs and disbursements to the defendant-appellant to be credited upon the judgment to be entered. Present — Martin, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Peck and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblum-v-singer-nyappdiv-1947.