Rosenblum v. Lanes

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenblum v. Lanes

203 Misc. 410, 124 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2327

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1952

StatusPublished

This text of 203 Misc. 410 (Rosenblum v. Lanes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenblum v. Lanes, 203 Misc. 410, 124 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Admittedly the squatter erected and maintained the television antenna without landlord’s permission or consent. This constituted an intrusion or squatting within the purview of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (Maple Lane Apts. v. Berson, N. Y. L. J., Jan 11, 1952, p. 150, col. 4; Maiorana v. Dubnick, N. Y. L. J., March 14,1952, p. 1042, col. 6; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Swill v. Kerne, N. Y. L. J., Oct. 15, 1951, p. 842, col. 4; Mackin Realty Corp. v. Matfus, 113 N. Y. S. 2d 61.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed in favor of the landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Feeeelly, Coldee" and Walsh, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Admittedly the squatter erected and maintained the television antenna without landlord’s permission or consent. This constituted an intrusion or squatting within the purview of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (Maple Lane Apts. v. Berson, N. Y. L. J., Jan 11, 1952, p. 150, col. 4; Maiorana v. Dubnick, N. Y. L. J., March 14,1952, p. 1042, col. 6; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Swill v. Kerne, N. Y. L. J., Oct. 15, 1951, p. 842, col. 4; Mackin Realty Corp. v. Matfus, 113 N. Y. S. 2d 61.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed in favor of the landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Feeeelly, Coldee" and Walsh, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 Misc. 410, 124 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblum-v-lanes-nyappterm-1952.