Rosenblum v. Harrington
This text of 216 A.D. 732 (Rosenblum v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Queens county reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate judgment granted, with ten dollars costs. The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage by reason of the non-payment of an installment of principal. It is undisputed that defendant subsequently paid the installment, and large sums in addition thereto, and that the plaintiff agreed that the action should be “ dropped.” Under these circumstances the plaintiff’s right to prosecute this action was lost. If any subsequent default occurred, the plaintiff would be obliged to bring a new action thereon. (Hack v. Goldblatt, 104 Misc. 249, Special Term, Monroe County, Rodenbeck, J.; Rathbone v. Forsyth, 171 App. Div. 26.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., .concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblum-v-harrington-nyappdiv-1926.