Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rosenbloom v. Baldwin

Rosenbloom v. Baldwin

249 A.D. 703, 292 N.Y.S. 511, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 703 (Rosenbloom v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenbloom v. Baldwin, 249 A.D. 703, 292 N.Y.S. 511, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment is for plaintiff for damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between two automobiles. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 703, 292 N.Y.S. 511, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbloom-v-baldwin-nyappdiv-1936.