Rosenbloom v. Baldwin

249 A.D. 703, 292 N.Y.S. 511, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment is for plaintiff for damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between two automobiles. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenbloom v. Baldwin, 249 A.D. 703, 292 N.Y.S. 511, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

249 A.D. 703 (Rosenbloom v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.