Rosenblatt v. Page

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rosenblatt v. Page

887 So. 2d 437, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18099, 2004 WL 2725061

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2004·No. No. 1D04-2965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 1, 2004, the Court has determined that the order on appeal does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested party in a probate proceeding, as it does not specifically direct disgorgement of the attorney’s fees paid in excess of the $1,500.00 determined to be reasonable by the order on appeal. Therefore the order is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2), and the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 1, 2004, the Court has determined that the order on appeal does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested party in a probate proceeding, as it does not specifically direct disgorgement of the attorney’s fees paid in excess of the $1,500.00 determined to be reasonable by the order on appeal. Therefore the order is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2), and the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Rosenblatt v. Page, 887 So. 2d 437, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18099, 2004 WL 2725061 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

887 So. 2d 437 (Rosenblatt v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.