Rosenblatt v. G. A. & A. Taxi Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenblatt v. G. A. & A. Taxi Inc.

275 A.D.2d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 916 (Rosenblatt v. G. A. & A. Taxi Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenblatt v. G. A. & A. Taxi Inc., 275 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Dore and Shientag, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment appealed from on the ground that conflicting testimony raised issues of fact and the credibility of the witnesses was for the trial court, and on the further ground that on plaintiff’s own testimony the trial court properly could have found that plaintiff was guilty of negligence causing or contributing to cause the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Dore and Shientag, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment appealed from on the ground that conflicting testimony raised issues of fact and the credibility of the witnesses was for the trial court, and on the further ground that on plaintiff’s own testimony the trial court properly could have found that plaintiff was guilty of negligence causing or contributing to cause the accident.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblatt-v-g-a-a-taxi-inc-nyappdiv-1949.