Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A. v. Flinn
485 So. 2d 484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1986
DocketNos. 85-63, 85-64, 85-233 and 85-248
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 485 So. 2d 484 (Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A. v. Flinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A. v. Flinn, 485 So. 2d 484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
Finding that appellants were not afforded basic due process requirements of notice and opportunity to be heard, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Quay Development, Inc. v. Elegante Building Corp., 392 So.2d 901 (Fla.1981); Shaw v. Shaw, 455 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hagopian v. Zimmer
653 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
485 So. 2d 484, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblatt-greene-arnowitz-pa-v-flinn-fladistctapp-1986.