Rosenberger v. Bitting

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rosenberger v. Bitting

15 Pa. 278

DecidedMarch 10, 1851

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Pa. 278 (Rosenberger v. Bitting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberger v. Bitting, 15 Pa. 278 (Pa. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The entries in the ledger, supported by the oath of the clerk who made them, might be read as a link in the transaction, and part of the res gestee, to prove that Lewis¿ having negotiated the note, had received value for it. He was called, in an action by his endorsee, to prove want of consideration; and no case could be more distinctly within the rule in Walton v. Shelly.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The entries in the ledger, supported by the oath of the clerk who made them, might be read as a link in the transaction, and part of the res gestee, to prove that Lewis¿ having negotiated the note, had received value for it. He was called, in an action by his endorsee, to prove want of consideration; and no case could be more distinctly within the rule in Walton v. Shelly.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Pa. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberger-v-bitting-pa-1851.