Rosenberg v. Wilson

115 S.E. 7, 154 Ga. 625, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 432
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1922
DocketNo. 3053
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 115 S.E. 7 (Rosenberg v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. Wilson, 115 S.E. 7, 154 Ga. 625, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 432 (Ga. 1922).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. On conflicting evidence the trial judge did not abuse bis discretion in refusing a temporary injunction and in dissolving the order appointing a temporary receiver.

2. A final decree can not be entered in any case at an interlocutory hearing. Accordingly, so much of the interlocutory order as refused an interlocutory injunction and dissolved the- former order appointing a temporary receiver is affirmed; and so much of the order as decrees the payment of costs to the receiver and the issuing of execution therefor, being final, is reversed.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur. Colley & Colley, for plaintiff. C. E. Sutton, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kight v. Gilliard
105 S.E.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Booker v. Scott
104 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Kniepkamp v. Richards
16 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Holeman v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia
200 S.E. 149 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Justice v. Warner
173 S.E. 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Rosenberg v. Wilson
128 S.E. 178 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 7, 154 Ga. 625, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-wilson-ga-1922.