Rosenberg v. Weston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenberg v. Weston

286 A.D. 875, 143 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D. 875 (Rosenberg v. Weston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg v. Weston, 286 A.D. 875, 143 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, alleged to have resulted from malpractice, for breach of contract and for expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order (1) denying appellant’s motion to preclude respondent from giving evidence at the trial with respect to matters set forth in appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars, and to modify respondent’s notice to examine appellant before trial so that respondent be required to serve a bill of particulars before the examination, and (2) extending respondent’s time to serve his bill of particulars until twenty days after completion of the examination. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering, alleged to have resulted from malpractice, for breach of contract and for expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order (1) denying appellant’s motion to preclude respondent from giving evidence at the trial with respect to matters set forth in appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars, and to modify respondent’s notice to examine appellant before trial so that respondent be required to serve a bill of particulars before the examination, and (2) extending respondent’s time to serve his bill of particulars until twenty days after completion of the examination. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D. 875, 143 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-weston-nyappdiv-1955.