Rosenberg v. United States

346 U.S. 324, 73 S. Ct. 1171, 97 L. Ed. 2d 1634, 97 L. Ed. 1634, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1899
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 19, 1953·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for reconsideration of the question of the Court’s power to vacate Mr. Justice Douglas’ stay order and hear oral argument is denied.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter

desires that it be noted that he too would deny the motion to reconsider the power of this Court to review Mr. Justice Douglas’ order to stay the execution, but not because he thinks the matter is free from doubt. See his dissenting opinion in Ex parte Peru, 318 U. S. 578, 590, in connection with Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, and Carper v. Fitzgerald, 121 U. S. 87.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 324, 73 S. Ct. 1171, 97 L. Ed. 2d 1634, 97 L. Ed. 1634, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1899 (1953).

346 U.S. 324 (Rosenberg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Farmer v. Kaufman
750 F. Supp. 106 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Crocker v. United States
323 F. Supp. 718 (N.D. Mississippi, 1971)
Meredith v. Fair
306 F.2d 374 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Goldsby v. State
123 So. 2d 429 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1960)
Rosenberg v. United States
346 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1953)