Rosenberg v. United States Mint

531 U.S. 976, 148 L. Ed. 2d 432
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 6, 2000·No. No. 00-6108·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberg v. United States Mint, 531 U.S. 976, 148 L. Ed. 2d 432 (2000).

531 U.S. 976 (Rosenberg v. United States Mint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hughes
384 F. App'x 509 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Vosburgh
602 F.3d 512 (Third Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Presbitero
569 F.3d 691 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Rankins
118 F. App'x 62 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Kenneth M. Senffner
280 F.3d 755 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Jett
18 F. App'x 224 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Guy J. Westmoreland
240 F.3d 618 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Wendell Nance, Sr.
236 F.3d 820 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)