Rosenberg v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 346, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1473
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rosenberg v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 295
United States Customs Court·Decided July 16, 1952·No. No. 56793; protest 174830-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the entry are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. The collector’s letter of transmittal, which was received in evidence, conceded that the conversion of the currency should have been aecom-[347]*347plished in the manner prescribed in Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoice should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberg v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 346, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1473 (cusc 1952).

29 Cust. Ct. 346 (Rosenberg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.