Rosenberg v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenberg v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

250 A.D. 721, 293 N.Y.S. 58, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8613

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 721 (Rosenberg v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 250 A.D. 721, 293 N.Y.S. 58, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, in favor of plaintiffs, in an action to recover the purchase price of a mortgage certificate, with interest, after rescission on the ground of fraud. The only questions raised in this court were the lack of proper tender of the certificate and the ratification of the sale by subsequent acts of the plaintiff Kellerman. These were questions of fact. (Vail v. Reynolds, 118 N. Y. 297; Insurance Co. v. McCain, 96 U. S. 84; McNeilly v. Continental Life Ins. Co., 66 N. Y. 23; Adair v. Brimmer, 74 id. 539, 554; Pryor v. Foster, 130 id. 171, 176, 177; Whipple v. Prudential Ins. [722]*722Co., 222 id. 39, 46; 27 C. J. pp. 22-24, and cases cited.) Order unanimously affirmed, with, costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, in favor of plaintiffs, in an action to recover the purchase price of a mortgage certificate, with interest, after rescission on the ground of fraud. The only questions raised in this court were the lack of proper tender of the certificate and the ratification of the sale by subsequent acts of the plaintiff Kellerman. These were questions of fact. (Vail v. Reynolds, 118 N. Y. 297; Insurance Co. v. McCain, 96 U. S. 84; McNeilly v. Continental Life Ins. Co., 66 N. Y. 23; Adair v. Brimmer, 74 id. 539, 554; Pryor v. Foster, 130 id. 171, 176, 177; Whipple v. Prudential Ins. [722]*722Co., 222 id. 39, 46; 27 C. J. pp. 22-24, and cases cited.) Order unanimously affirmed, with, costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 721, 293 N.Y.S. 58, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-title-guarantee-trust-co-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack