Rosenberg v. Smooke

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenberg v. Smooke

33 Misc. 765

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 765 (Rosenberg v. Smooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg v. Smooke, 33 Misc. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is whether the goods, to recover the price of which this action is brought, were sold to the defendant or to her husband. Upon this there was a conflict of evidence, which the trial justice has resolved in favor of the plaintiffs. We see no reason for disturbing his decision in that regard.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is whether the goods, to recover the price of which this action is brought, were sold to the defendant or to her husband. Upon this there was a conflict of evidence, which the trial justice has resolved in favor of the plaintiffs. We see no reason for disturbing his decision in that regard.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-smooke-nyappterm-1900.