Rosenberg v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenberg v. Rosenberg

259 A.D. 822, 20 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 822 (Rosenberg v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 259 A.D. 822, 20 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting petitioner’s application and directing the treasurer of the city of New York to pay petitioner the sum of $1,000, deposited on August 13, 1938, in an action entitled “ Fannie S. Shane, as administratrix, etc., against Joseph Rosenberg, et al.,” reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to determine what arrears, if any, there were up to February 24, 1939, the return [823]*823day of Rosenberg’s motion for his release. It is impossible to tell from this record if Rosenberg was in default in making his twenty-dollar weekly payments. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting petitioner’s application and directing the treasurer of the city of New York to pay petitioner the sum of $1,000, deposited on August 13, 1938, in an action entitled “ Fannie S. Shane, as administratrix, etc., against Joseph Rosenberg, et al.,” reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to determine what arrears, if any, there were up to February 24, 1939, the return [823]*823day of Rosenberg’s motion for his release. It is impossible to tell from this record if Rosenberg was in default in making his twenty-dollar weekly payments. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 822, 20 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1940.