Rosenberg v. Rae
This text of 18 A.D.2d 696 (Rosenberg v. Rae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to reform a contract for the sale to plaintiffs of certain real property, so as to include a contiguous triangular gore, and for specific performance of the contract as reformed, the defendant Rae and the two corporate defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 15,1961, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as against them on the ground that, within the meaning of section 210 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 A.D.2d 696, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-rae-nyappdiv-1962.