Rosenberg v. Novack

112 So. 2d 60, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 1959·No. No. 58-253·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An appeal was taken by minority stockholders from a summary final decree directing specific performance of a contract for repurchase by two Florida corporations of stock in the corporations held by the “Kirkeby group”. Upon denial of petition for rehearing, the latter group then complied with the decree, and two of the five appellants have withdrawn and been dismissed from this appeal. Appellants argued principally that the lower court should have held the contract unenforceable under F.S. § 608.13(9) (a) (b), F.S.A. The record and authorities contained in the briefs of the parties have been carefully considered upon this point, and the court has concluded that the position of appellants is without merit.

However, since the decree makes no disposition of the appellants’ cross-bill, the lower court is directed to hear the same and enter its decree upon such issues as remain.

The decree otherwise appearing without error, it is affirmed, with directions.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON,. J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberg v. Novack, 112 So. 2d 60, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

112 So. 2d 60 (Rosenberg v. Novack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carman v. Gunn
198 So. 2d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Harbeson v. Jackson Land Co.
143 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)