Rosenberg v. Maryland Casualty Company
132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 724, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 238
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenberg v. Maryland Casualty Company, 132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 724, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 238 (N.J. 1926).
132 A. 923 (Rosenberg v. Maryland Casualty Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.