Rosenberg v. Kings County Savings Bank

270 A.D. 904, 61 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4572
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1946·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing [905] the complaint at the close of the entire case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Plaintiff, a monthly-tenant, was injured when a fire occurred in the kitchen of her apartment, located in a building owned by the defendant. Concededly, the building was not within the purview of the Multiple Dwelling Law and the rights of the parties are governed by common-law principles. .There was evidence that the fire was caused by defective wires in the electric light fixture in the kitchen; that the defective condition had existed for some time prior to the occurrence, to the defendant’s knowledge; and that the defendant had made repairs to the fixture before the fire. Proof of repairs was some evidence that there had been a reservation of a degree of control of the premises by the defendant as landlord, and the record presented questions of fact which required submission to the jury. (Sendero y. Campbell, 288 N. Y. 328; Antomen V. Bay Ridge Savings Bank, 292 N. Y. 143.) Lewes, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Aldrich and Ñolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberg v. Kings County Savings Bank, 270 A.D. 904, 61 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 904 (Rosenberg v. Kings County Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Morse
9 A.D.2d 188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Boreyko v. Bay Ridge Savings Bank
274 A.D. 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Reische v. Montgomery
273 A.D. 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)