Rosenberg v. Heffron

163 F.2d 631
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 1943
DocketNo. 10174
StatusPublished

This text of 163 F.2d 631 (Rosenberg v. Heffron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. Heffron, 163 F.2d 631 (9th Cir. 1943).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the transcript of record and briefs filed by respective parties, and oral argument by counsel, ordered motion of appellant for transmittal of evidence denied, and order of District Court affirmed, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this ■Court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 F.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-heffron-ca9-1943.