Rosenberg v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenberg v. Gray

234 A.D. 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 898 (Rosenberg v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg v. Gray, 234 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, as resettled, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of granting the plaintiff summary judgment for the amount due upon the instruments in question, with interest from their dates of maturity respectively, the attorney’s fees being deemed waived. The defendant presented no proof sufficient to entitle him to defend [899]*899this action within rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, as resettled, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of granting the plaintiff summary judgment for the amount due upon the instruments in question, with interest from their dates of maturity respectively, the attorney’s fees being deemed waived. The defendant presented no proof sufficient to entitle him to defend [899]*899this action within rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-gray-nyappdiv-1931.