Rosenberg v. Feldblum

254 A.D. 561, 3 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6563

This text of 254 A.D. 561 (Rosenberg v. Feldblum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. Feldblum, 254 A.D. 561, 3 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgments affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — ■ Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents in part and votes to reverse the judgments in favor of the defendant, Adolph Feldblum, as administrator of the estate of Meyer Chinsky, deceased, as against Mary Rosenberg, as administratrix of Joseph Rosenberg, deceased, and Elias A. Kamenetzky, on the defendant-respondent’s counterclaim, on the ground that the note of Yiddish Literary Publishing Corporation was not shown to have been protested nor notice of protest served on said indorsers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 561, 3 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-feldblum-nyappdiv-1938.