Rosenberg v. Feigin

241 P.2d 1043, 110 Cal. App. 2d 56, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 26, 1952
DocketCiv. No. 18580
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 P.2d 1043 (Rosenberg v. Feigin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. Feigin, 241 P.2d 1043, 110 Cal. App. 2d 56, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [114 P. 838]).

The appeal is dismissed.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenberg v. Feigin
260 P.2d 143 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 P.2d 1043, 110 Cal. App. 2d 56, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-feigin-calctapp-1952.