Rosenberg v. Feigin
241 P.2d 1043, 110 Cal. App. 2d 56, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481
Opinion
The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [114 P. 838]).
The appeal is dismissed.
White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rosenberg v. Feigin, 241 P.2d 1043, 110 Cal. App. 2d 56, 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952).
241 P.2d 1043 (Rosenberg v. Feigin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenberg v. Feigin
260 P.2d 143 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)