Rosenberg v. Denno
This text of 346 U.S. 271 (Rosenberg v. Denno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for leave to file petition for an original writ of habeas corpus is denied.
The disposition of an application to this Court for habeas corpus is so rarely to be made by this Court *272 directly that Congress has given the Court authority to transfer such an application to an appropriate district court. 28 U. S. C. § 2241. I do not favor such a disposition of this application because the substance of the allegations now made has already been considered by the District Court for the Southern District of New York and on review by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Neither can I join the Court in denying the application without more. I would set the application down for hearing before the full Court tomorrow forenoon. Oral argument frequently has a force beyond what the written word conveys.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 U.S. 271, 73 S. Ct. 1152, 97 L. Ed. 2d 1607, 97 L. Ed. 1607, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-denno-scotus-1953.